Search for: "USA V. WILLIAM WOLF"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
Kelsey Clinton analyzed oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he justices agreed Friday to hear two cases challenging congressional and state legislative districts in Texas, adding them to ones already pending from Wisconsin and Maryland. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
At Tuesday’s arguments in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Arizona comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, who reports that “four justices wrote separately to criticize Arizona’s capital sentencing process, which they strongly suggested is unconstitutional,” Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Keri Blakinger at Chron, Howard Fischer at Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Pete… [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
” In Beckles v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “if the justices don’t reach a final conclusion” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Michael Doyle of McClatchy, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Brett Norman of POLITICO, Erin Fuchs of Business Insider, and David Kravets of Wired. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, William Goren looks at Monday’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today (who has another story focusing on the Chief Justice), from Jeremy Jacobs at Greenwire, where he discusses what the Court’s decision might mean for its ruling in the still-pending Clean Air Act cases, and from the Associated Press, which covers consumers’ reactions to the decisions. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
Briefly: At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]hree moms from Montana will be at the Supreme Court Wednesday with a chance to make history on religious school choice”; “[w]hat they’re fighting over [in Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 6:35 pm
” Jess Bravin and James V. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “the court’s four liberal justices were so incensed that they each wrote separate dissents totaling 31 pages. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
” A broader look at the court’s recent death-penalty cases comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today, who observes that 40 “years after the high court reinstated the death penalty in another Georgia case, the justices are increasingly divided over when it is applied, how it is administered and whether it serves any purpose. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the effect that the decision has had on other liberal causes, including the immigration and abortion battles at the Court this Term. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen remarks that the cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Coverage of the case comes from Richard Wolf in USA Today, who reports that “the decision for the six justices remains a preliminary one: whether the Muslim immigrants’ case should be dismissed outright. [read post]
