Search for: "USA v. COOPER"
Results 61 - 80
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
The Order acknowledges the overlapping jurisdiction of both agencies and encourages them to cooperate fully, both with each other and with other departments and agencies, in the exercise of their oversight authority. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
Pix Credit: U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:55 am
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., No. 20-1119; Attorney Fees: Roadie, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:44 am
U.S v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
USA v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
This is the effect of R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2, a judgment handed down on 5 February 2021. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
This note summarises the key aspects of the UK Supreme Court judgment.[1] Background KBR Inc. is a USA-incorporated company, which has no presence or history of business within the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Under the 2017 law and other components of China’s domestic legal framework, the Chinese government can arguably compel Chinese businesses to cooperate with and provide access to intelligence and security services. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
[A belated update on my accomplishments in 2020.] [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:05 pm
The Board affirmed, citing NLRB v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
The Presidential election in the USA has raised more issues regarding the spread of misinformation. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
” Opryland USA Inc., 23 USPQ2d at 1475 (quoting Celotex v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
Attorney's Office in 2012 prosecuted U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Ruling in Trump v. [read post]