Search for: "USA v. Mark Lay" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Eliminating most patent marking suits and the best mode requirement to name two. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
____________*Constitutional scholars of the Episcopal Church (USA) might well want to ask themselves: what, exactly, went "into [canonical] effect" on July 1, 2011? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
General Convention of 1892 met in Baltimore, but was marked by even more disagreement in the Constitutional sphere than had occurred at the preceding gathering. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Phard S.p.A., Opposition No. 91172486 [Section 2(d) opposition to ZU ELEMENTS (Stylized) for various paper goods, leather goods, and clothing, in light of various registered and common law marks comprising or containing the mark ELEMENTS for identical goods].July 13- 2 PM: In re Roc USA, LLC , Serial No. 77044525 [refusal to register the mark ROC USA for business management consulting services and for educational services in the field of community… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
  This is why a USA Today editorial argued, “NSA has your phone records; ‘trust us’ isn’t good enough. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]