Search for: "USA v. Roger Williams"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
And those sponsors include some of the most prominent members of the Senate - Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (Email) of Woodstock, Senate President Pro Tem Tommie Williams (Email), Transportation Committee Chairman Jeff Mullis (Email) of Chickamauga, and Chief Deputy Whip John Wiles (Email) of Cobb County, among others. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court. 08a0418p.06 USA v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Williams Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0662n.06 USA v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Derek Barr, Roger Craig White, and Chris Nicole White ("Plaintiffs-Appellants"), students at William Blount High School ("the school") in Blount County, Tennessee, would like to express their southern heritage by wearing clothing depicting the Confederate flag at school. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Loans 3 Vincent McClean UNODC Homebuyer 2 william Cairney century 21 ny metro real estate broker 2 Bidjan Oheb lee odell real Estate Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 3 MANUEL VARGAS KW PANAMERICAN REALTY BROKER 2 Mia Dellannie Citi-Habitats Brokerage - Residential 3 Barry Kimchy Marcus and Millichap Commercial real estate broker 3 Gerald Fink Jerry Fink Real Estate Brokerage - Residential 3 Max Dylan Lu M Properties Brokerage -… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We agree with the United States, VACATE the sentences, and REMAND for re-sentencing. 07a0346p.06 2007/08/28 USA v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]
