Search for: "USA v. Seizure Warrant"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 1:43 am
FinesmithCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Warrants"A two-week restriction of a communications data warrant was unnecessarily restrictive of the state's right of investigation. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) Member states endorse senior WIPO appointments (WIPO) (Afro-IP) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IAM) Ocean Tomo sells patent deal business for $10 million (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) Global Global - General… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
In re Search of Tobaccoville USA, Inc., 2009 U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
The case was Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Mayfield v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Miranda v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:29 am
But the Supreme Court's 7-1 (Justice Kennedy recused) decision this term in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
07a0142p.06 2007/04/20 USA v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
§ 1003.1(e)(6)(v) is warranted. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Skanska USA Building Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
("Title III"), we AFFIRM the district court's orders. 07a0089p.06 2007/03/02 USA v. [read post]
