Search for: "Union Pacific Railroad Corporation"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am
An employee who is represented by a union has the right to request and have a union representative present at an investigatory interview that he/she reasonably believes may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
It is almost inevitable that where these challenges become powerful enough, especially against a powerful and entrenched orthodoxy, that the explosion and transformation (either to "return" to purity to to sweep away impurity in the march toward the ultimate state of "perfection") will not be pacific. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:15 am
The Corrections Corporation of America and G4S (formerly Wackenhut), two prison privatizers, sell inmate labor at subminimum wages to Fortune 500 corporations like Chevron, Bank of America, AT&T, and IBM. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Asbestos Corporation Ltd, 2014 WL 9910834 (Ill. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
In our schools, our newsrooms, even our corporate boardrooms, there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
Despite our hardships, our union is strong. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm
Tuesday, November 2, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.: CSIS will host a webinar examining the Quad’s strategic approach to China, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Business Wire, May 4, 2010 Navistar International Corporation /quotes/comstock/13*! [read post]
