Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 61 - 80 of 13,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
Inc. accused Kirkland of making misleading legal filings to conceal the romance between bankruptcy Judge David R. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm by Brett Trout
LDG appealed the district court’s ruling to The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:03 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently issued an opinion regarding a receiver’s standing to assert fraudulent transfer claims and other torts on behalf of the entity it is overseeing. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential trademark decision affirming a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruling that sustained Framboise Holdings, Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential trademark decision affirming a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruling that sustained Framboise Holdings, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is required… [read post]