Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 61 - 80 of 9,754
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Further, said the Court, the petitioner has the burden to establish that the event producing the injury was accidental in nature, and the Comptroller's determination will be upheld where it is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Further, said the Court, the petitioner has the burden to establish that the event producing the injury was accidental in nature, and the Comptroller's determination will be upheld where it is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
(The Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for federal courts, recently announced a new policy intended to crack down on this type of “judge-shopping. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm by Katharine Allen and Sean Maffett
Entities (i) with greater than 20 employees, (ii) that file Federal income tax returns demonstrating gross receipts or sales exceeding $5,000,000, and (iii) having a physical office in the United States are also exempt from the Proposed Rule. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
Second, the statute gives the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) the power not only to impose tariffs, but also to impose fees and other restrictions, as well as take all other appropriate and feasible action within the power of the President. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
Second, the statute gives the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) the power not only to impose tariffs, but also to impose fees and other restrictions, as well as take all other appropriate and feasible action within the power of the President. [read post]