Search for: "United States v. Ocean"
Results 61 - 80
of 788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 1:24 pm
Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice (prisoner, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:17 am
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – June 24th, 2019) involves a class action claim. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:03 am
United States Department of the Interior, 1:21-cv-11091-IT; and Responsible Offshore Development Alliance v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:30 am
People of State of California v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm
That is, to be considered Water of the United States (WOTUS), the water needs continuous surface connection to traditionally accepted WOTUS, such as rivers, lakes, and oceans. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Aug. 8, 2017), the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an ocean carrier stiffed by an intermediary in a freight transaction may recover unpaid freight from the original NVOCC who arranged the cargo transportation unless the evidence clearly shows the carrier intended to release that party from liability. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Aug. 8, 2017), the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an ocean carrier stiffed by an intermediary in a freight transaction may recover unpaid freight from the original NVOCC who arranged the cargo transportation unless the evidence clearly shows the carrier intended to release that party from liability. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Aug. 8, 2017), the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an ocean carrier stiffed by an intermediary in a freight transaction may recover unpaid freight from the original NVOCC who arranged the cargo transportation unless the evidence clearly shows the carrier intended to release that party from liability. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:04 am
The International Rule of Law and the United Nations Charter Wei Shen, Evolution of Non-discriminatory Standards in China’s BITs in the Context of EU-China BIT Negotiations CommentsXiaohui Wu, Case Note: Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:11 am
The United States Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:19 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:53 am
(Quoting PPL Wallingford Energy LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
In doing so, did the Florida Court's decision cause a "judicial taking" proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]