Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
A lawsuit was filed Friday by Americans United for Separation of Church and State on behalf of a Catholic woman challenging actions by the federal government and the state of South Carolina that permit foster-care placement agencies to use religious criteria for approval of foster care families. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:33 am
Supreme Court addressed the case of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
It should be noted that South Carolina has not adopted the Daubert test and instead follows its own test set forth in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 4:19 am
United States (2012), the Supreme... [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:55 am
A South Carolina federal district court has issued a preliminary injunction barring the state of South Carolina from further advertising, distribution or production of its controversial "I Believe" license plate. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
United States, C.A. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:24 am
Neither South Carolina nor West Virginia are thought of as progressive states. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
The deputation issued the following statement:Due to the actions of General Convention, the South Carolina Deputation has concluded that we cannot continue with business as usual. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:58 am
Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), the United States Supreme Court found South Carolina’s methods for support enforcement violated due process. [read post]
