Search for: "United States' Opposition to Companies' Motion to Strike"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The following is an adapted version of my memorandum on my motion for judgment on the pleadings. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Anything less would be a violation of the United States' First Amendment. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:48 am
Once considered the symbol of opposition to Israel and the West, many Sunni countries in the region perceive Iran now as the biggest threat of all, while the Islamic State is more focused on the destruction of Iran than of America. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm
The measure, which would incentivize information-sharing on cyberattacks between companies and the government, faces opposition from both privacy advocates and those who feel its security measures do not go far enough. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Copyright law in the United States is almost exclusively governed by the federal Copyright Act, which preempts equivalent state laws. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Copyright law in the United States is almost exclusively governed by the federal Copyright Act, which preempts equivalent state laws. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 11:17 am
Back in the United States, however, opposition to the ongoing negotiations appears to be growing stronger. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Their argument is that, merely by registering to do business in a state and/or appointing an agent for service of process, a company impliedly consents to general jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Instead, company representatives say it is a “human in the loop” system. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Just yesterday, we filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the statute; you can read the full motion in a PDF, but I also include the text below: Introduction The sale of handguns is not only legal — it is constitutionally protected. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:26 am
We return from recess, and Clayton resumes his argument in opposition to AE19—a motion to strike common allegations from the charge sheet against Al-Hadi. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:49 am
This is an appeal from a United States Magistrate Judge report. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Tate, Acting Legal Advisor, Department of State, to the Attorneys for the plaintiff in Civil Action No. 31-555 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
DeJohn and Kump then moved to strike the motion to compel “because it was not signed by counsel”, i.e., had apparently not been signed by FFR’s lawyer. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
It is not enough, for example, to nitpick about the details surrounding the United States’ 1998 missile strike against Bin Laden, as the defense does in its pleading. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The General Government). [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 1:55 am
This was a motion to preclude, not a motion to strike or exclude. [read post]
