Search for: "United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia" Results 61 - 80 of 567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am by Rubric Legal LLC
The Specifics of the Original Case The underlying case, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Olivia Cross
In compliance with an order of a United States District Court, effective December 7, 2020, U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Map of the United States District Courts in Virginia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)I have discussed both payment bond claims under the Miller Act and alternate dispute resolution (ADR) here at Construction Law Musings on many an occasion. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:04 am by Jacob Schulz
Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia charged the former British nationals with conspiracy to commit hostage taking resulting in death, hostage taking resulting in death, conspiracy to murder United States citizens outside of the United States, along with two material support charges. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:34 am by Julia V. Brock
On September 9, 2020, the law firm Cohen Milstein filed a lawsuit in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Anne Sacoolas, a United States citizen and wife of U.S. diplomat Jonathan Sacoolas, for her part in the wrongful death of Harry Dunn. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:34 am by Julia V. Brock
On September 9, 2020, the law firm Cohen Milstein filed a lawsuit in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Anne Sacoolas, a United States citizen and wife of U.S. diplomat Jonathan Sacoolas, for her part in the wrongful death of Harry Dunn. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Bruce Zagaris
Attorney for the Eastern District Virginia brought a criminal complaint against a Russian national for his alleged role in a conspiracy to use the stolen identities of real U.S. persons to open fraudulent accounts at banking and cryptocurrency exchanges. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Bruce Zagaris
Attorney for the Eastern District Virginia brought a criminal complaint against a Russian national for his alleged role in a conspiracy to use the stolen identities of real U.S. persons to open fraudulent accounts at banking and cryptocurrency exchanges. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Stefan Soesanto
Yet when the United States announced the indictment, its attempt to build a vocal alliance of like-minded countries flopped spectacularly. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1983 suit from the Eastern District of North Carolina, the plaintiff was a pretrial detainee in custody of the Wake County Sheriff. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Eric Halliday
Almost as soon as the police killing of George Floyd brought crowds to the streets across the United States, President Trump and Attorney General William Barr urged federal prosecutors to pursue charges against protestors who allegedly damaged property or provoked violence. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
The United States faces a growing terrorism problem from the far right and white supremacists. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm by Olivia Cross
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia where it can introduce new evidence such as a consumer survey. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
Booking.com B.V., 591 U.S. ___ (2020).The U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia concluded, based on evidence of consumer perception, that BOOKING.COM, unlike the word "booking" itself, is not generic. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia disagreed, stating that, when combined with a generic “second-level domain” (such as “booking”), a “top-level domain” (such as “.com”) generally has source identifying significance, and concluding that “the combination of [the two] is generally a descriptive mark that is protectable upon a showing of… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:10 am by Eric Goldman
” It goes on to declare:  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that, to the maximum extent permissible under the law, this provision is not distorted to provide liability protection for online platforms that—far from acting in “good faith” to remove objectionable content—instead engage in deceptive or pretextual actions (often contrary to their stated terms of service) to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree. [read post]