Search for: "United States of America v. D&L Sales, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2010 WL 1257931, at *2 (D. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Allegiance Corporation (TTABlog) Another restaurant name dispute – District Court S D New York: Nothing Heavy, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm by Kelly
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits Int’l N.V (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Proof of paying sales tax and tracking sales are not enough control for trademark licensing: Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]