Search for: "United States v. 38 CASES, ETC." Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
  Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
U.S. citizens or permanent residents or U.S. companies), or in cases where significant conduct occurred within United States territory. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
U.S. citizens or permanent residents or U.S. companies), or in cases where significant conduct occurred within United States territory. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
General Assembly (A/72/162) (the 2017 WG Report) sought to unpacks the concept of access to effective remedies under the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
In this case, it is the money that representing ABS investors can produce. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Josh Blackman
” I think the answer is exactly what Trump said it meant: keeping terrorists out of the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
 Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He considered (applying PG v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He considered (applying PG v  United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]