Search for: "United States v. 44 CASES, ETC." Results 61 - 80 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Schneider case which resulted in the largest ever IP judgment in China of 330 Million CNY ( about US $44 Million). [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is perhaps ironic that Wigmore has had far more staying power in Canada than in his home country, the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lindon v France (2008] 46 EHRR 35 is a good example of the new approach of the court. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 3:05 am
Achille Lauro Ed Altri-Gestione, etc., 937 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1991)). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[25]  The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26]  In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice, service of process,… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The concept of adverse possession was subsequently adopted in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
In an earlier case, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
Negative Declaration Case Law Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]