Search for: "United States v. 75 CASES, ETC."
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
This law as amended was the copyright law of the United States from July 1, 1909 through December 31, 1977. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
I stupidly stuck to the notion that everyone is equal under the law etc. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
She stated in her declaration that, On July 11, 2022 I received two harassing phone calls from different people, calling me cunt, bitch, slut, lying on men etc and indicating they would rape and kill me. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
The Regular Session ended on June 1st and the First Extraordinary Session ran from June 1st until June 30th.[1] In the first two sessions, the legislature enacted several tax changes including suspension of the capital stock portion of the corporation franchise tax for small businesses, imposition of a sales tax collection obligation on marketplace facilitators, and changes to several of the state’s procedural rules related to tax cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:03 am
United States, No. 2008-5022 (Jan. 16, 2009) held that the federal government was not liable in inverse condemnation for taking property damaged by Southern California wildfires in 2003. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Department of Water Resources, et al, etc. (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 726 (Ct. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Proof allowed in Heather Capital case. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
I have personally been involved in cases with more than 75 payors contributing to a settlement, including contractors, insurers, and sureties. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:36 am
However, the jurisdiction of each High Court is, as a general rule, confined to persons within the territorial boundaries of the State or the Federal Capital Territory, as the case may be. [read post]
