Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE OR DEVICE, ETC."
Results 61 - 80
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:19 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
[Also related is this article regarding efforts to install surveillance devices inside certain systems.] [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:26 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
As I explained in my past last May, in U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP).[6] The problems of conforming to evolving norms becomes more difficult where states project their authority through commercial enterprises, that is where the societal (and economic) governance order of the enterprise is conflated with the political and legal order of the state.[7] SOEs have undergone tremendous change in both operation and framework ideology since 1945.[8] The contemporary faces of state owned… [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
[etc.] or packaging of any type or nature;(ii) that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a mark registered on the principal register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in use, whether or not the defendant knew such mark was so registered;(iii) that is applied to or used in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office... [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
Global Global – General Guidelines for securing open source software (EFF) Global – Copyright A game we all win: Dumping DRM can increase sales while reducing piracy (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (Michael Geist) PK In the Know podcast (Microsoft deal to get TV on your Xbox, ACTA review etc) (Public Knowledge) Anti-piracy company pirates Deus Ex in controversial experiment (TorrentFreak) iCopyright article tools for WordPress (PlagiarismToday) Global… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm
However, the Court appears to recognize that there are other ways of demonstrating intent, as through reference to state law, arbitral rules, etc. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But instead of just taxing “televisions”—which would be very difficult in a world of technological convergence where consumers can “watch television” on any number of devices (PCs, mobile phones, portable gaming devices, portable media players, etc.) [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
Hinton v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is clear that the only possible ground justifying the restriction or limitation are national security and public order (ordre public) as stated in Article 19 of the ICCPR and Article 16 of HKBOR. 101. [read post]
