Search for: "United States v. Badger"
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Badger Acquisition LLC, 983 So.2d 1175, 1183-84 (Fla. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm
Third, the theories offered by the state and the United States as amicus curiae are in my view far too broad, but the best answer is actually quite tricky but should be rooted in causation principles. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm
Third, the theories offered by the state and the United States as amicus curiae are in my view far too broad, but the best answer is actually quite tricky but should be rooted in causation principles.By way of full disclosure, I should add that I was approached by counsel for King for advice, and that I provided pro bono assistance to King in helping to craft King’s argument. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
United States, 221 U.S. 325, 330 (1911). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:05 pm
United States, that is more of a constitutional problem than directly regulating. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 am
There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by ... [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
If the term “animal units” is a mystery to you, read this example of an ordinance. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:26 pm
United States, 287 U.S. 112, 119. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:51 am
The Court concludes that the Jackson rule does not "pay its way," United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:51 am
The Court concludes that the Jackson rule does not "pay its way," United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time as… [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
