Search for: "United States v. Barrett" Results 61 - 80 of 1,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court raises broad questions about Colorado ruling on Trump
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets ‘Office under the United States’; Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy; But Mitchell’s concern about Foreign Emoluments Clause ‘boomerang’ could have cut off a path of complete victory.”
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm by Howard Bashman
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Term Limits v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that is Likely to Carry the Day
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
 Justice Barrett, in particular, hinted at such constraints by invoking analogies to M'Clung v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
" Professor Tillman, heavily bearded with black-rimmed glasses and a bookish demeanor, flew to the United States this week to watch the arguments. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman
“In Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Weekend Roundup
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Niz-Chavez Decision Could Save You From Deportation
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
Immigration News - https://www.shusterman.com/
Immigration Is Not an “Invasion” under the Constitution
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part One: Why the U.S. Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election Ballot
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
 Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/