Search for: "United States v. Bayer Company" Results 61 - 80 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Bexis
  Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Bayer Corp., 563 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2009), and Chang v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit)   United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46)   United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
  See Tang, slip op. at 7-9.Still, some enterprising lawyers tried to make that litigation the latest Chinese export to the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Even assuming that more companies begin to adopt arbitration clauses similar to the one used by AT&T Mobility, the long-term impact of Concepcion may simply be to shift the focus of consumer class action litigation in the United States to other industries, such as insurance, to which the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply, or to situations in which companies have not interfaced directly with consumers and therefore have no arbitration agreement to enforce.… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am by Brenda Fulmer
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by smiplaw
Abbot’s patent ‘551 was found to be unenforceable by the District Court, because Abbot failed to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a brief filed with the European Patent Office (EPO) regarding an earlier patent, U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Generally, a party “is ‘[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought,’ ” United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Bayer Corp., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 1938428, at *5-6 (7th Cir. [read post]