Search for: "United States v. Board of Supervisors" Results 61 - 80 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employment issues to consider while awaiting decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) will imminently release its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and if the final ruling is consistent with the recently-leaked draft opinion (overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey), employers may soon need to contend with a variety of novel… [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am by John Elwood
It would have a hard time saying otherwise, since the government itself petitioned for Supreme Court review on this very issue a couple years back in the much-relisted United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm by Coral Beach
We need to know exactly who in the company was aware of this failure and the alleged attempts to hide this information from the FDA,” DeLauro said during a meeting on the Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by jonathanturley
While the district court ruled against Wilson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and found a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Following release of an October 2015 draft and May 2016 final EIR, the County’s Planning Commission recommended denial, but the Board of Supervisors thereafter approved the specific plan, and the immediate rezoning of the 662-acre portion of the West Parcel out of the TPZ, by 4-1 vote. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
On the heels of former Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas’s indictment and suspension from the city council, the Board of Supervisors voted to conduct the audit to ensure transparency in the county’s contracting procedures, which came into question following Ridley-Thomas’s indictment on federal bribery and conspiracy charges. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:20 am by INFORRM
The workshop “convened leading experts from the United States and the European Union for a series of non-public, guided discussions. [read post]
Plaintiffs sued the State Water Resources Control Board (the “Board”), alleging that the board violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) by granting a small domestic use registration to real parties-in-interest without first conducting an environmental review. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]