Search for: "United States v. Branch" Results 61 - 80 of 4,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm by Wells Bennett
The AUMF provides authority to detain these individuals within the United States and transfer them out of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
The Judicial Branch's power of judicial review arises out of Marbury v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
 After all, the Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States supreme over state law, and while an agency regulation can plausibly be described as a "law" of the United States, it is hard to see how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is a kind of federal "law" that preempts state law. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:14 am by Ruthann Robson
Benisek, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court decided that the judicial branch has no role... [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm by Tom Smith
Secondly, the will of a sole senator can gum up the United States Senate. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
In our view, the phrase "Office . . . under the United States" refers to appointed positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, as well as non-apex appointed positions in the Legislative Branch. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
In fact, the immigration court system is a branch of the Department of Justice, headed by the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
This is not for lack of asking by the executive branch. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
"And, with similar, but more alarming, sentiment, the dissent by Judge Staton, sitting by designation from the Central District of California:"In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward calamity. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:34 pm by Ben Vernia
The United States is also entitled to intervene in the lawsuits, as it did in these cases.This matter is being handled by the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division and the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]