Search for: "United States v. Bush, et al.,, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Circuit denied various motions to intervene or for reconsideration of motions to intervene as follows: The motion of the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
Obama, et al., or “Kiyemba III,” docket 10-775), “every Guantanamo detainee with a final, non-appealable order granting a habeas petiton has been released from United States custody and sent to his home country or another appropriate country. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:45 am by Jonathan Hafetz
But, it’s worth remembering that the issue of where, legally speaking, the United States is at war with al Qaeda remains an open one, Hamdan notwithstanding. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Jeralyn
Sixteen months ago, a three judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's order dismissing the ACLU's lawsuit in Mohamed et al. v Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
The one remaining case on the docket — a case involving more than 150 detainees — is Khadr, et al., v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
As usual, Orwell has it right; Bollinger et al. have it wrong. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:18 pm
Circuit Court, in an opinion that is now being challenged in the Supreme Court in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:32 am
  The  judge’s 48-page opinion in Gherebi, et al., v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
Bush et al., a 2006 case filed in the Eastern District of Philadelphia. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]