Search for: "United States v. Clayton" Results 61 - 80 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am by Jim Chen
 .In many merger cases, the contribution of antitrust law begins and ends in the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 7:52 pm
In Re: New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-1990 (6/30/08) affirms the dismissal of suit under Section 4 of the Clayton Act brought by lessees of new cars, who argued that the defendants "conspired to restrict the flow of cheaper Canadian cars into the U.S. market...resulting in artificially high rental payments under plaintiffs' lease agreements in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
The student was introduced to the fundamental character of the division of governmental power in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 6:28 am by Dean I. Weitzman, Esq.
Somers, nurse Lori Chambers, Main Line Hospital and United Anesthesia Services, the story states. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:45 pm by Bevin Newman and Thomas Dillickrath
The United States Supreme Court’s single antitrust case of the 2019 term, Apple, Inc v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:05 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Wednesday, AFCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm by Josh Wright
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]