Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
United States (1993) concurrence. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:04 am
New York and Clinton v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
City of New York and Clinton v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
[1] Appendix V of the Regulatory Program of the United States Government, April 1, 1992–March 31, 1993 The post Circular Reasoning? [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
” In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
Such a lawsuit could concede that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Line Item Veto Act in Clinton v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:55 am
Vilsack and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
See Clinton v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
That ten-year ban was signed by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994 but expired on September 13, 2004. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:43 pm
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957). [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
The post The Strange Case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
