Search for: "United States v. Colorado Supreme Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Yet, before the Supreme Court, the Petitioner's opening brief barely mentioned "Office under the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson: Collected Posts
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election BallotPart Two: The Three Possible, but Less-than-Ideal, Dispositions of the CasePart Three:  Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t AddressBruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do [UPDATED to respond to Bruce's follow-up post]Part… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 The Court will likely reverse the Colorado Supreme Court based on Griffin's Case, the absence of congressional legislation enforcing Section 3, and the prudential and pragmatic arguments made in Section 3 of the Brief signed by Attorneys General Edwin Meese III, Michael B. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Supreme Court takes the bench in Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Takeaways from the Supreme Court oral arguments on the Trump 14th Amendment case
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
A 19th Century Supreme Court case, In Re. [read post]
J&Y Personal Injury Blog - https://jnylaw.com/blog/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
But when I walked into the Supreme Court this morning, I felt a sense of closure. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that is Likely to Carry the Day
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
  Over the past few decades, the Supreme Court has adjudicated many cases involving state ballot exclusions and conditions, some involving restrictions on parties, other involving restrictions on particular candidates. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
US Supreme Court hears arguments over Colorado decision disqualifying Trump from state primary ballot — developing story
8 Feb 2024, 8:12 am by Lauren Ban | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
The US Supreme Court has begun hearing oral arguments in former President Donald Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Court decision to remove the former president from the state’s primary election ballot in the upcoming 2024 presidential election cycle. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
This morning I will be joining the live coverage of the Supreme Court of the arguments over the disqualification of former President Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
The Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Nine: Ten Arguments that Petitioners Haven’t Raised (or that Trump Only Invoked Late in the Game)
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
 “Off-Ramp” Arguments that would result in reversal of the Supreme Court of Colorado without adjudicating Trump’s eligibility that Petitioners have not raised 8. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
Anderson litigation, both the Colorado District and the Colorado Supreme Court found Section Three to be justiciable and Trump has not pressed a political question argument in his Supreme Court merits briefs. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/