Search for: "United States v. Comstock"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Today's court ruling should be a wake-up call for the United States Senate to do its job, hold hearings on RFS2, and address the adverse impacts of this unrealistic program. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
" Efforts to site the only nuclear waste storage facility in the United States, the Yucca Mountain Repository in Nevada, were suspended in 2010 and no replacement facility has yet been identified. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm
United States, 547 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
To be sure, during the oral argument, Justice Breyer may have undermined the effectiveness of his hypo by appearing to agree with Michael Carvin (for the NFIB) that the argument for federal power in the inoculation case is of a piece with the argument for federal power in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The United States also argues that the mandate is necessary and proper to carry out the law's insurance reforms. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Raich and United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
