Search for: "United States v. Cortez-Cortez"
Results 61 - 80
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
United States, testing the sweep — or the narrowness — of a federal law that seeks to protect evidence of crime from being destroyed. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
See Weiss v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Indeed, Harry Crouch, president of the NCFM, announced that the organization was “exploring its options, including filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Cortez, No. 08-10805, 2009 WL 890622, at *1 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am
” The Framers were familiar with the Wilkes case and wanted to avoid such legislative abuse in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
The closest precedent is United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Anti-SLAPP Law The anti-SLAPP law provides that "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:27 am
United States, one of the most controversial United States Supreme Court decisions of the 20th century. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
United Cerebral Palsy has compiled a comprehensive Resource Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy in Colorado. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]