Search for: "United States v. Fernandez"
Results 61 - 80
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Fernandez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Fernandez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:59 am
In Fernandez v Bailey, 2016 WL 5149429 (M.D., FL ., 2016) the district court denied Petitioner Roque Jacinto Fernandez’s Petition for Return of his Children to Panama. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:50 pm
United States Shaw v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Analysis of Tuesday’s oral argument in Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:10 am
United States [transcript, PDF]. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:18 pm
United States, No. 15-537. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:07 am
United States is here; the transcript in Shaw v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:21 am
The first case set for argument, Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
United States, which is scheduled for oral argument next Tuesday, maintaining that “there is no Double Jeopardy problem in this case” because “Bravo-Fernandez isn’t an inconsistent verdicts case at all. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
In Fernandez v Bailey, 2016 WL 4474633 (M.D. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses next Term’s double jeopardy case Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Holly Fernandez Lynch & Gregory Curfman, Bosses in the Bedroom: Religious Employers and the Future of Employer-Sponsored Health Care, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:02 am
In this appeal, the Court considers the following question of law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Does the premises liability rule set forth in Olivo v. [read post]