Search for: "United States v. Hair"
Results 61 - 80
of 748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
AFSCME (2018); Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am
The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
" MICHAEL OMI & HOWARD WINANT, RACIAL FORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES 122 (3d ed. 2015); see also PETER H. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 2:03 pm
In a 2012 case called United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
[1] FTC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am
Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify Links discussed in this episode: “Google LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
On March 7, a federal judge finally did what many analysts had long—and queasily—feared. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
The Gree companies sold over two million dehumidifiers in the United States between 2007 and 2013, but learned in late 2012 that the dehumidifiers could overheat and catch fire. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
The defamation claim in Cohan v Darr (Kokopelli Hair Salon and Lounge Gallergy) SC-2021-004721 was dismissed and counterclaim refused. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Sept. 14, 2020) (ADHD, generalized anxiety disorder, trichotillomania [compulsive pulling out of hair]); Doe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 6:53 am
Is a Split Hair viz. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
Whether the exclusionary policy rests on the alleged undesirable propensities of those of a particular race, nationality, occupation, political affiliation, or age, in this context the Unruh Act protects individuals from such arbitrary discrimination.[14] An earlier decision likewise stated that, under the Unruh Act, a shopping center couldn't exclude prospective customers "who wear long hair or unconventional dress, who are black, who are members of the John Birch… [read post]
