Search for: "United States v. Harrington" Results 61 - 80 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am by Ezra Rosser
Meyer 4(2), pp. 91–112 Reconstructing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to More Effectively Alleviate Food Insecurity in the United States Craig Gundersen, Brent Kreider, John V. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
“I think that that’s unknowable,” Trivett says in reference to whether Baluchi will actually be housed at Camp VII, though Judge Pohl counters that it would be highly likely, especially given the travel ban for detainees to the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm by Kate Howard
United States 16-5454 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
Sellers16-6855Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am by David Hopen
Edward Ryan, an attorney for the United States, then informs Judge Pohl that he is prepared to respond, but asks for a moment with the Chief Prosecutor and co-trial counselor. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am by Clara Spera
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Stephen Page
The United Nations by contrast deals with public international legal issues. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]