Search for: "United States v. Hatch" Results 61 - 80 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
United States held that Congress cannot force states to enact legislation. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
As President Trump notes, one of the articles of impeachment [Article 10] charged President Johnson with insulting and denouncing Congress by "mak[ing] and declar[ing] … certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues … [which] are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Its stated mission is to align U.S. national interests with global media, “to inform, engage and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:16 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 1391(c)(3) allows the lawsuit in N.J. against the foreign corporation: (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm by CAFE
To listen to the full episode, and get access to all exclusive CAFE Insider content, including the newly launched United Security and Cyber Space podcasts, try out the membership free for two weeks: www.cafe.com/insider Sign up to receive the weekly CAFE Brief newsletter, featuring analysis by Elie Honig: www.cafe.com/brief REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:  State of Wisconsin v. [read post]