Search for: "United States v. Hoffman"
Results 61 - 80
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
”; “marriage is widely regarded as the definitive expression of love and commitment in the United States. [read post]
United States Court of Appeals Reverses and Remands Product Liability, Leg Amputation Injury Lawsuit
3 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Anderson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
The federal district court hearing the case agreed with the ASM to conditional certify the overtime case as a collective action pursuant to the United States Supreme Court case Hoffman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
"The Coque decision further evidences the erosion in New York of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
" United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:32 pm
Zubik v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Hoffman's analysis follows along with his translation of the relevant portions of the opinion. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:57 pm
" Another class action lawsuit, Hoffman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
The Defendants moved, inter alia, for partial summary judgment based on: (a) a claim that one of the Plaintiffs had submitted fraudulent documents when applying for employment with one of the Defendants in violation of the Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA"), which criminalizes the presentation of forged evidence of entitlement to employment within the United States; and (b) the decision of the United States Supreme Court in… [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 3:57 am
Despite public outcry, and the urging of physicians, asbestos is still not banned in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:02 pm
Bollinger relied on a line of Supreme Court cases, including Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
