Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm
By: Mayel Tapia-Fregoso In the United States, copyright law protects original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:56 pm
Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009). [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
