Search for: "United States v. John Lawrence" Results 61 - 80 of 499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
DOJ then convened a hearing before a designated “hearing officer,” Lawrence Grauman, a well-respected former Kentucky state judge. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
The team challenging the law includes Roberta Kaplan, who shepherded the successful challenge top DOMA in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by Andrew Koppelman
By the end of 2008, approximately 32,000 same-sex couples had married in the United States, and 80,000 more were domestic partners, reciprocal beneficiaries, or united in civil unions. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
The key to the ruling was the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]