Search for: "United States v. Kevin Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which Thomas “challenged the court’s reliance on stare decisis,” noting that “[t]he coming terms will see if others join [Thomas] in revisiting a number of precedents. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am by Amy Howe
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper discusses the possibility that Justice Clarence Thomas could be questioning whether the Court’s decision in Citizens United applies to the states. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:57 am by Michael Baudinet
United States dealt with a narrow question of statutory construction in the federal bank fraud statute 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, which asks whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act, comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am by Broc Romanek
” A few weeks ago, the IMF published its FSAP review of the United States, covering banking, insurance and securities. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent from denial of cert on Monday in Garco Construction v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
YudellCase number: 15-cv-04548 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: June 11, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 16, 2015 7/31/2015 10/29/2015 2015-74 SEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]