Search for: "United States v. Lieu" Results 61 - 80 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
In an order issued on October 1, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Hadden v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:43 am by Jason J. Kim and Christopher J. Dufek
On June 11, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled that American Pipe tolling does not extend to follow-on class actions brought after the statute of limitations period has run. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
  The case was distributed on January 30 for a February 15 conference, and thereafter the Solicitor General was invited to present the views of the United States, which he has not yet done. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:10 pm
§ 1229c to depart the United States voluntarily at his own expense in lieu of being deported (a right that is available under some circumstances, and was available to Garcia). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has noted this divide, but not staked out its position. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm by Brian Crossman
" The appellate court had found that the local requirement to reserve a specified percentage of the rental units as low income units, conflicted with the state provision. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:56 am by Ben Rubin
  In the petition for review, the CBIA asserted that review is warranted because the Court could resolve a conflict created by the Sixth Appellate District's decision, and "settle the important legal question of how the United States Supreme Court's decision in Koontz applies to in-lieu development fees in California." [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
In lieu of granting leave to appeal the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in People v McKinney, concluding that the defendant’s statement that he would “just as soon wait” until he had an attorney before talking to the police, followed immediately by his statement that he was willing to discuss the “circumstances,” was not an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel or a statement declaring an intention to remain silent under Davis v… [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by David Kramer
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by David Kramer
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:49 am by Layla Kuhl
The Court held two cases in abeyance pending the outcome of People v Bryant, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
The latter Rule states that, in lieu of a sworn statement, the language of 18 U.S.C. [read post]