Search for: "United States v. Michael Russell" Results 61 - 80 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
 The Federalist was the first self-conscious handbook on the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-282Issue: Whether conspiracy to commit a robbery, absent any overt act in furtherance of the crime, is itself a violent felony presenting a serious potential risk of physical injury justifying an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Posted by Jonathan Doorley and Greg Roumeliotis, Brunswick Group LLP, on Sunday, February 16, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, TSR ISS 2025 US Benchmark Policy Guidelines Posted by Alessandra Murata, Michael Bergmann, and Michael Mencher, Cooley LLP, on Monday, February 17, 2025 Tags: Executive Compensation, Proxy advisors, Say on pay, SPACs New C&DIs on Types of Shareholder Engagement Could Cause Loss of Schedule 13G Eligibility Posted by Amy… [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Posted by Jonathan Doorley and Greg Roumeliotis, Brunswick Group LLP, on Sunday, February 16, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, TSR ISS 2025 US Benchmark Policy Guidelines Posted by Alessandra Murata, Michael Bergmann, and Michael Mencher, Cooley LLP, on Monday, February 17, 2025 Tags: Executive Compensation, Proxy advisors, Say on pay, SPACs New C&DIs on Types of Shareholder Engagement Could Cause Loss of Schedule 13G Eligibility Posted by Amy… [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
United States and Yates v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses the Court’s Fourth Amendment cases dealing with intrusive police surveillance and what they may portend for the increased police use of drones in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses the implications of the Court’s decision in Citizens United for the 2012 election. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]