Search for: "United States v. National Insurance Underwriters" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
” On this basis, the court concluded that the claimant’s alleged loss would have occurred in the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by S2KM Limited
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) represents a comprehensive expansion and restructuring of the United States health care system whose most important and controversial provisions for personal injury settlement planning, including the individual mandate and elimination of pre-existing condition restrictions, will become effective nationally on January 1, 2014. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
For instance, the Comptroller of the Currency requires national banks to have "adequate fidelity coverage." [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This subparagraph does not apply to claims under flood policies issued under the national flood insurance program. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This subparagraph does not apply to claims under flood policies issued under the national flood insurance program. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
Other settlements include the following: Merrill Lynch Mortgage Backed Securities, $315 million (refer here); Lehman Brothers offering underwriters settlement, $417 million (refer here); Washington Mutual, $208.5 million (refer here); Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities, $125 million (refer here); National City, $168 Million (refer here); Colonial Bank, $10.5 million (refer here); and Lehman Brothers executives, $90 million (refer here) and E*Trade, $79 million (refer here). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Abbe R. Gluck and Gillian Metzger
The “tangible link to commerce … based on empirical demonstration” that Justice Kennedy identified as necessary under the Commerce Clause two Terms ago in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Joe Wallin
If you care about the startup company ecosystem, I encourage you to give this question some thought and write the SEC. [1]Persons covered include (i) the issuer, (ii) any predecessor of the issuer; (iii) any affiliated issuer; (iv) any director, officer, general partner or managing member of the issuer; (v) any beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of the issuer’s equity securities; (vi) any promoter connect with the issuer in any capacity at the time of such sale; (vii) any… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:11 am by StartUpAdmin
(ii) Is subject to any order, judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, entered within five years before such sale, that, at the time of such sale, restrains or enjoins such person from engaging or continuing to engage in any conduct or practice: (A) In connection with the purchase or sale of any security; (B) Involving the making of any false filing with the Commission; or (C) Arising out of the conduct of the business of an underwriter, broker, dealer, municipal… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]