Search for: "United States v. New York Times Company" Results 61 - 80 of 3,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 New York Law Under New York law, the attorney-client privilege regarding pre-merger communications between an attorney and his or her client which are related to a business/corporate merger does not fully pass to the new or surviving company/buyer, but remains with the former shareholders of the prior company/seller (see Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis, 89 NY2d at 130). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Broc Romanek
KPMG (certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Donnini earned his LL.M. in Taxation at New York University [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Donnini earned his LL.M. in Taxation at New York University [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 11:46 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
The State was unable to search Andrews’s cell phones, despite the efforts of its Telephonic Intelligence Unit, the New York Police Department’s Technical Services Unit, the FBI’s Regional Computer Forensics Lab and a private technology company. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Conor McEvily
United States (which Nabiha also covered in yesterday’s round-up) garnered coverage from several major news outlets. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  She quoted from the recent New York Times series criticizing consumer arbitration clauses and cited the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s study that inspired it. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  She quoted from the recent New York Times series criticizing consumer arbitration clauses and cited the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s study that inspired it. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The New York Times [£] reports on Russian interference with the upcoming Presidential election, citing national security sources which state the country is trying to aid Trump in re-election and Trump’s own relationship with national security. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to… [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Kelly Schoening
A recent summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit – which exercises federal appellate jurisdiction over New York, Connecticut and Vermont — serves as a reminder that an employer’s reliance upon its employee handbook can also prove its undoing. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 6:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
Morgan, as Bear Stearns successor in interest, appealed the ruling to the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am by INFORRM
The New York Times has considered how misinformation is still a challenge in the post-Trump era [£]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 11:56 am by Wells Bennett
We’re a long ways way off from a trial in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The New York Times Article may be read here: New York Times The Washington Post Article may be read here: Washington Post The Supreme Court opinion in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:58 am
As pointed out in this article in the New York Times,  "[t]he question before the court was not whether use of the term “light” amounted to fraud. [read post]