Search for: "United States v. ONE ARTICLE OF DEVICE, ETC."
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
[etc.] or packaging of any type or nature;(ii) that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a mark registered on the principal register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in use, whether or not the defendant knew such mark was so registered;(iii) that is applied to or used in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office... [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is clear that the only possible ground justifying the restriction or limitation are national security and public order (ordre public) as stated in Article 19 of the ICCPR and Article 16 of HKBOR. 101. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
As I explained in my past last May, in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
[Also related is this article regarding efforts to install surveillance devices inside certain systems.] [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
At least one of the defendants, Jose Carranza, 28, is an illegal alien with a criminal record, but yet had been able to remain in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:26 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The other is the maturation of Chinese outbound economic and investment policy, where its construction of an outbound nationalist globalization—the One Belt One Road policy--relies to some extent on the projection of commercial power through Chinese SOEs. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:19 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
Hinton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
But his skepticism about oaths certainly extends to quasi-religious oaths like those exacted from the President and, under Article VI, all public officials, whether state or national. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
The device’s use allowed Volkswagen to market its diesel vehicles to environmentally conscious consumers, increasing its sale of diesel cars in the United States and abroad and, as a result, its profitability. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
The legal framework (categories and criteria of assessment) consolidates elements coming from various sources, both internal and external to the EU: from EU State aid law to the subsidy chapters in the most recent PTAs negotiated by the EU, from multilateral trade law (see the expired presumptions in Article 6.1 WTO ASCM) to more recent subsidy initiatives (see the draft rules of the ‘Trilateral’ Initiative: January 2020). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But instead of just taxing “televisions”—which would be very difficult in a world of technological convergence where consumers can “watch television” on any number of devices (PCs, mobile phones, portable gaming devices, portable media players, etc.) [read post]
