Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
She added: “The upside is to create a system which can rebuild trust between the press and the public, which of course is paramount, but which allows freedom of expression“. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
(3) An examination of whether notorious foreign infringers have attempted to or succeeded in accessing capital markets in the United States for funding or public offerings [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
In April 1994, in the now-famous congressional hearings before the United States House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Big Tobacco executives asserted yet again that the causal relationship of smoking and cancer had not been proven: the CEOs of ... [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:02 pm
United States (1969 Trade Cases ¶72,730) and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:26 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) -- also cited by plaintiffs -- the court cautioned that: The State's power over the beds of navigable waters remains subject to only one limitation: the paramount power of the United States to ensure that such waters remain free to interstate and foreign commerce. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
The term fair use originated in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:17 pm
In one, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In Boseman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
The case was the subject of a 1992 book, Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
