Search for: "United States v. Polk"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
It noted, quoting the United States Supreme Court in Bell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
United States Department of Agriculture, which addressed the proper standard of review for compelled commercial speech. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining how these charges arose and by reviewing similar, earlier allegations that had been made against Rath:The stipulated factual basis for Rath's guilty plea provided as follows.Rath became acquainted with the victim and her family while stationed with the United States Army at the Fort Polk Military Reservation in Louisiana. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
Ver United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
As Wikipedia explains, “impeaching” a witness “in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual who is testifying in a trial. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
(For those unfamiliar with claim construction, see Polk Wagner's introductory lecture.) [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 06-10446-RGS. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
His pleadings sought “billions” of dollars for consumers throughout the United States, and asserted that the food service industry systematically deceived customers through these allegedly deceptive practices. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:23 am
Rakoff’s rejection in 2011 of the consent settlement in United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:09 am
However, there was a subsequent change in the law when the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bullock v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:22 am
The 1997 Supreme Court case of Richardson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
See Wayte v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm
The case is known as United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and he then practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, both in New York City. [read post]
