Search for: "United States v. Queen"
Results 61 - 80
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:06 pm
United States) is the European court system's repudiation of the British military justice system in Findlay v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that there are two critical elements necessary to make a criminal or penal law ex post facto: 1) it must be retrospective, and 2) it must disadvantage the offender affected by it, (Champelle v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:36 pm
Respondent obtained a default custody order in Queens Family Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
” Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:24 pm
In addition, even if New York law allows for jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the case must "comport with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution" – i.e., there must be minimum contacts with the forum jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 8:53 pm
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:08 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:28 am
The leading authority on this, Maaouia v France (39652/98) (2001) 33 EHRR 42 ECHR establishes this beyond doubt and it is reflected in domestic law by cases like MNM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2000) INLR 576 IAT. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
A.M. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Gaudin v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
The Queen (on the Application of AB) v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:01 am
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Government Allowed Discovery in CWA Case; No Prior Formal Discovery Under FRCP 26 United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:09 pm
(Employment Law; Tribal Council) United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:35 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
United States, appellee v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
