Search for: "United States v. Reef"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
The three islands, known as Mischief Reef (Chinese: Měijì Jiāo; Filipino: Panganiban Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Vành Khăn), Subi Reef (Chinese: Zhǔbì Jiāo; Filipino: Zamora Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Su Bi), and Fiery Cross Reef (Chinese: Yǒngshǔ Jiāo; Filipino: Kagitingan Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Chữ Thập), were once low-tide elevations (LTEs),… [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
It was the first-ever official meeting with leaders of all four Quad countries: Australia, India, Japan and the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Justice David Souter, writing the majority opinion for the United States Supreme Court, upheld Exxon's liability for the incident, but found the $2.5 billion excessive. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
Facility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Muller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Ct. 2009). http://bit.ly/9iApZ1 United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Among the cases on which review was denied Monday were these: ** The constitutionality of a state business profits tax that treats dividends paid to U.S. companies by foreign subsidiaries differently, based upon whether those foreign units do business within the state. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Nixon, United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm
According to a statistical analysis conducted by KKC, the United States obtained over $270 million in sanctions from 100 polluters and paid 206 whistleblowers a total of more than $33 million in rewards under APPS. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
United States. 36 Colum. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 1:06 am
As he explained:* The factors that the court had to take into account when deciding whether to set the judgment aside were expressly stated in the CPR r.13.3. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm
The case sent shock waves through Biglaw, and technology vendors and consultants scrambled to find methods that would withstand judicial scrutiny.The second reason defensibility became an issue was the rise of legal outsourcing, both in the United States and abroad. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:02 pm
The case is Umberger v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:02 pm
The case is Umberger v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:02 pm
The case is Umberger v. [read post]
