Search for: "United States v. Roger Austin" Results 61 - 76 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) EWHC (Ch) Looney v Trafigura – a fable of copyright communication (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US IP Enforcement Coordinator issues annual report (IP Watch) US Chamber of Commerce releases 2011 IP policy agenda (IP Watch) New White House IP Advisory Committees elevate IP enforcement to highest level (IP Watch) (Patent Baristas) (Copyright Alliance) (The Domains) Jimmie Reyna to finally get confirmation hearing (Inventive Step) US to refresh… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am by Greg Guedel
The Navajo Nation court system is the largest and most established Tribal legal system in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
Do we classify them as Chief Justice Taney did Dred Scott and African Americans generally, as having no rights that the United States is bound to respect? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
New-York City-hall Recorder 6 v. (1817-1822) Rogers, Daniel (Editor). [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]