Search for: "United States v. Rogers"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm
(United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:36 am
., Executive Director of the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race & Justice at Harvard Law School, and Johanna Wald, Director of Strategic Planning at the Institute, write movingly about the United States Supreme Court's infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:44 am
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
The saga of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:01 am
Taney In 1826, Taney and Daniel Webster represented a client in a case that appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
When Tatel pressed further, Gershengorn seemed to agree that this would doom the United States’s position. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:55 pm
United States, 529 F.3d 1112, 1115-17 (D.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:10 pm
Earlier this week, Senior United States District Judge Roger Vinson of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida declared the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Act”) void in a summary judgment decision in the case of State of Florida, by and through Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Penney “‘Zeran v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:54 pm
by Roger Alford Donald “Trey” Childress has the scoop: Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mammoth en banc opinion in the case of Sarei v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
Dec. 21, 2010), a party can be liable for contributory infringement without having imported or sold a product in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Roger writes: It appears that the Ecuador plaintiffs will not seek to have the judgment enforced within the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm
As amicus in the case, The National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) argued that when the private interest at stake is someone’s personal liberty counsel should be made available to the alleged contemnor in all instances, as is currently the case in a majority of jurisdictions in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:27 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California said at the outset of today's Epic Games v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:45 am
Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. and In re Youngbear, and asked for a response (CFR) in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:10 am
Twelve year old prior conviction was inadmissible simply because probation period fell within ten years under FRE 609(b); circuit notes open issue on whether a revocation of probation or parole on the underlying conviction may stop the ten-year clock, in United States v. [read post]
