Search for: "United States v. Ronald Paul" Results 61 - 80 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, § 12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Paul Salem and Randa Slim argued that the United States will need a “diplomatic surge,” in Iraq, akin to the “surge” of 2007 by the military, as it begins to wind down the fight against ISIS. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
”Over 500 cases have cited Mezei with approval, including the Ninth Circuit, which quoted it in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Now that he has been sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump is entitled to a four-year lease on the White House. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am by Sandy Levinson
  For that, I read a really terrific book by Peter Strauss Administrative Justice in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Ronald Collins
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Of course, that time period was shared largely by a Republican-appointed solicitor general (Paul Clement) and a Democratic-appointed solicitor general (Elena Kagan). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]