Search for: "United States v. Rule" Results 61 - 80 of 50,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 5:15 am by SCOTUSblog
United States that expert testimony that ‘most people” have a particular mental state is not an opinion about the defendant and therefore does not violate federal evidentiary rules. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The treatment of a foreign state like a domestic state captures the fact that both are governing units with similar inherent functions and powers. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
“Section 230 establishes a liability rule for litigation in U.S. courts rather than a conduct rule that applies to actions taken outside the United States…This case is being litigated in the United States, so applying Section 230 as a defense to liability involves a domestic application of Section 230, even if the actions that might otherwise create liability occurred elsewhere. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:19 am by Bailey DeSimone
In the United States, the Lavender Scare and subsequent initiatives against LGBTQ+ folks serving the United States in military, foreign, or civil service became a driver of the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Vineesha Sow
Two cases were filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, State of Texas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Factual background In 2016, MUR (the shipowner, a Dutch company) and RTI (the charterer, a Jersey company and subsidiary of United Company Rusal plc) entered into a contract of affreightment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Background (based on the outline provided by the DSC’s decisions)  X (appellant) obtained a judgment in the United States against Y (appellee), which then sought to enforce it in Canada (Ontario) via a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]