Search for: "United States v. Santiago"
Results 61 - 80
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
DOT and United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
This may not be as well-known to those who live out on the coasts, but the United States is currently suffering through a drought as bad as any we’ve seen in some time—United States Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recently said it was “the most serious situation we’ve had in probably 25 years. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which covers Florida, Georgia and Alabama, announced this month that a disabled worker must be able to identify and specifically articulate the reasonable accommodation that he or she is seeking. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:12 am
Santiago, 495 F.3d 820, 824 (7th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:46 pm
In a recent case, Castellanos v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Mortgage, 520 F.3d 1289, 1291 (11th Cir. 2008) (holding that “subsection 8(b) does not apply to settlement fees that are alleged to be excessive”); Santiago v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
The follow is the framework and as addressed in Santiago: “Under the foundation test set out in People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Mondragon–Santiago, 564 F.3d 357 (U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:29 pm
Alas, the First admits that the Supreme Court is likely to decide the issue in United States v. [read post]
